Looking Back: A Reflection of an Interesting Semester Learning Multimodal Comp.

Posted in Uncategorized on December 11, 2008 by steveo86

First off I just want to say I had a great time taking this class, despite the occasional moments I wanted to throw my laptop out the window during the multiple times I struggled with movie maker editing. I really liked the unique style of this course, and how it had a sort of informal, community feel to it. It is a breath of fresh air to have a class that not only teaches unique material with unique methods, but also has a completely different classroom style compared to the traditional lecture hall we are all too familiar with. 

I like the concept of using online applications such as youtube, blogs, and facebook as an everyday function of the class. It really made the class easier to learn from and work on assignments since it uses many of the technologies and applications I am use to and enjoy in everyday life. I think more english courses, and academics in general should consider implementing a style more like this class so that students who are better aquainted with these applications and style of teaching can better soak in the material that’s being taught to them that they otherwise might find difficult flipping through a thick textbooks. I am currently taking 3 history courses, and a foreign language course, all of which require a great deal of constantly flipping through large textbooks and writing up endless amounts of papers. 

 I took this class because I was aware of this and felt I needed to mix things up, which I happy to find worked out. Admittedly I didn’t know much about what this class would consist of, but I did some research on what multimodal comp. entailed and at that point I knew I’d be interested in this class.

I took a class similar to think in which we discussed the implications of technologies in society and utilized applications like blogs and google docs. I enjoyed that course as well, but it didn’t quite focus on how these technologies can be used in an english class, and being an ITK course, focused more on the drier aspects of technology such as coding, student servers, and economics. This class was very helpful and interesting to me because it combines two aspects I enjoy; writing, and internet applications, and it has helped to expand my understanding of both. 

I also liked the fact that I finally had an excuse to mess with move maker. Up until this point, I had just been using movie maker in my spare time here or there as just some fun little program that I used to put together the occasional funny video clip or music video that I would show off to my friends.  I was excited to hear of the prospect of actually using it for an academic course, since I enjoy editing and making (or attempting to make) videos.

I think multimodal composition is a very under-examined topic because it really has proven to be beneficial in society and I really think in the near future we are going to see it explode in popularity as far as being utilized in the classroom, not just by students in their leisure time.  I think this class is really ahead of the curve in terms of how useful it will be in the future in a society that is using more technologies as means of social networking, entertainment, and education. 

Going into this class, I had a vague idea about multimodal composition, but throughout the course I’ve really learned the implications of progams like blogs and google docs being used in academics and learned that multimodal composition is becoming more and more relevent and popular all the time, moreso than I realized. I also was able to learn more about the background of multimodal composition and how it compares/constrasts to traditional writing, and how a new generation of students have a tendancy of learning more visually/non-linearly (is that a word?) as a result of new technologies. I didn’t realize before this class how seriously many professors are taking this influx of technologies and found it interesting to learn about some of the new classroom prototype designs at the Watson Conference that accomidate this new generation of students. 

Presenters such as Michael Trice and Katherine Hayles in particular taught me some interesting information I hadn’t really considered; that technology was causing a sort of disruption in the traditional academic system in the sense that a relatively new concept like flash design is being taught in the some manner from the middle school level to the master’s level. This is because the academy simply has not figured out at what level something like this should be taught, as opposed to english and grammar skills which academia has reached a clear concensous and has a clear system of what information should be taught at what grade level. I also learned whath Katherine Hayles dubs the “Hyperattentive” vs “deepattentive” generations which learn better from multple information streams/images/video or from text in a long novel respectively. 

I felt the class was very non-specific in terms of what objectives we were to achieve as students and exactly how we were suppose to go about creating projects and assignments. In part this is a good thing, because it gave us a lot of freedom for us to chose the topics and applications that best suit our interests, which was a liberating feeling from the constrictions and limitations placed on us by many other more traditional classes.  At the same time though things were at times a bit vague to the point where I got confused from time to time as far as what certain assignments should be like, and how I should go about creating them. One thing I would suggest would be to get a little more in depth teaching things like the student servers and move maker, since all of us ended up using them a lot but were left in the dark about certain aspects of these applications.

 I also felt we could have spent a little time at least exploring certain other applications such as google docs, youtube, and maybe even something like second life, since that is something I think will hit it big sooner or later as well. I do understand though that this class is a relatively new concept, and there are a huge amount of technologies out there to be examined, so it’s not an easy task setting presice goals and fitting everything into one semester.

Still, those nitpicky gripes aside, I really enjoyed this class and learned a lot of useful information that I feel will benefit me greatly in the future, since I am considering a career in online journalism and creating a website and/or blog.

Status Report…

Posted in Uncategorized on November 27, 2008 by steveo86

whoops, I just realized I was suppose to report on our group’s progress awhile ago, but better late than never.. Guess I’ve just been too wrapped up in that editing ;)

So basically as of now the video is in it’s final stages of development. By that I mean it’s just about finished, it’s just not quite as polished as I want to be. I basically need to add credits for everything including all the photos in the vid, get a little more footage (mostly to be used as broll during some of those long answers by Mike Trice and Katherine Hayles, and tweak a few other minor things like music and transitions. I think I probably worked on more than was necessary for last class haha, but at least now the bulk of the editing I think is finished.

Amos has been helping me out with the vid, Jessica’s handling the behind the scenes footage, which will probably be used at the end of the main video, and Vince is going to work on the majority of the director’s commentary. Overall I think we’re in really good shape.

Sessions of Interest/ Preparation for Watson Conference

Posted in Uncategorized on October 9, 2008 by steveo86

 

 

Session A. 8

1:15 PM to 2:30 PM

This is a Composition Class? Using Video as a Rhetorical and Aesthetic

Medium for Academic Inquiry

Thursday, October 16, 2008 

————————————

Session B. 3

4:30 PM to 6:00 PM

Gaming and Stories

 Digital Warriors: How the U.S. Military is Redefining Literacy in the 21st Century

Friday, October 17, 2008

———————————————

Activity Theory and New Genres

 Session C. 2

 8:00 AM to 9:15 AM 

 Reconsidering Academic Literacy in a Mediated Age

Friday, October 17, 2008

———————————————

Session D. 2

11:45 AM to 1:00 PM

Designing Digital Scholarship (and Having it Count): A Case Built On

Three Perspectives

An Argument for Wikifying the Annotated Bibliography

Friday, October 17, 2008  

————————————-

Session E. 10

4:15 PM to 5:45 PM

Reimagining the Composition Classroom

Using the Internet to Re-imagine the classroom as a public space of possibility.   

Saturday, October 17, 2008

——————————————–

Session F. 3

8:00 AM to 9:15 AM

The New Work of Research

Composing Community in a Digital World 

Saturday, October 18, 2008

——————————————–

Session G. 9

9:30 AM to 10:45 AM

Collaborative Teaching: Across Disciplinary Borders

‘Broadcast Yourself’: Composing Citizens in the Age of YouTube

 ——————————————

 5 Assest/ methods of research:

- Find information from students about how much they use the internet and technology for schoolwork as opposed to textbooks.

- Find out what sorts of sources are being utilized the most and how they are effective in giving information. 

- Conduct research on the abilities of handheld devices like the Ipod, Blackberry, and cell phones and what the future holds.

- Look into web based information sites like Wikipedia and conduct resarch about their creation and their uses. 

- Look over Watson readings that deal with the subject of new media and its implications in society, particularly Scott DeWitt-”Documenting New Media and Writing Studies

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3 Critical Lenses that I Value

Posted in Uncategorized on September 4, 2008 by steveo86

Basically, good writing to me draws in the reader. It keeps them interested by some interesting aspects or “tools” that the writer uses to intrigue the reader. These are a few traits of writing that I value and believe help contribute to the “formula” of a quality piece of writing.

Controversial – Now by controversial I don’t mean a piece of writing or entertainment that just throws violence and profanity in there for the sake of cheap shock value. But rather, the writing should create attention through elements that make the reader question or even critizise the work. To me, good writing can be categorized as art, and what makes art unique is that it generally has a shock factor. This often times is conveyed by looking critically at an aspect of society. It gets people talking, draws people in, and perhaps stirs up some controversy. The same can very much apply to good writing. Usually when something is controversial, it means that there is some aspect in it that is intreging or thought provoking enough to get people’s attention. 

Here’s a somewhat extreme example of what I am talking about: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7E3oIbO0AWE. It is a documentary about a possible conspiracy of the 9/11 attacks. Now whether or not you actually believe this is irrelivant. The point is that some college student made this documentary off a relatively small budget, and has created a massive hit, mainly because of its controversial nature. The documtary presents ”evidence” that support a government conspiracy, and the producer lets you make your own conclusion. This has become such a huge hit because it got people talking. It got people thinking, talking, and arguing. It has brought positive reactions, and naturally, VERY negative reactions. But bad publicity is still publicity. 

Wittines/ Humor - Not an absolute requirement, but definetly an aspect that I admire in good writing and entertainment. Much like the controversial aspect, a whitty piece of writing can get the reader thinking. It can make the piece really stand out, and draw in a large audience. It can get people talking with one another about the smart humor in the writing, and add some spice to what might be an otherwise boring or uninteresting piece of writing. Most importantly, it makes the piece more memorable. Of course it doesn’t necessarilly have to be whitty to be humorous, but usually if we’re talking about writing, it’s difficult to have humor WITHOUT being whitty.

Here’s an example of a piece of writing that I enjoy simply because it’s witty and thought provoking It’s only a post about puns, but the writer manages to make it very funny and clever: (Warning, there’s some profanity here. Believe it or not, this is actually one of his cleaner works… http://www.thebestpageintheuniverse.net/c.cgi?u=puns

And here’s an example of something that’s pretty much the opposite end of the spectrum in humor. It’s definetly not witty, in fact, many people may think it’s the opposite of witty; that it’s stupid. However, some (including me), still find it funny, and so it’s still something I value in writing or videos: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7QLSRMoKKS0

Creative - The type of writing that stands out the most to me is creative. It does something crazy or different that sets it apart from the clutter. You might have heard the same rules apply to advertising but it’s also very true with writing. Like advertisers, writers want to draw in as big an audience as they can. I believe the easiest way they can do this is through their creativity; making something thought provoking and deep that makes it stand out and keeps the reader thinking about it.

This is actually a link to a music video, however, the visuals and the lyrics are both very creative, so I figure it’s an appropriate example. It’s also an awesome band, so enjoy: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I438RH1oUJc

THIS… IS… YOUTUBE!

Posted in Uncategorized on August 21, 2008 by steveo86

Hello world!

Posted in Uncategorized on August 21, 2008 by steveo86

WordPress.com.

Hey! This is my first blog… I’m Steve LaGioia, a senior and History major, mostly into ancient history like Greece, Rome, Egypt, all that good stuff… Anyway I’m kind of new to this blogging stuff, so don’t expect too much fancy formating or anything, but I do like to write so I at least have that going for me. 

Enjoy my blog!